Functionalists Theory On Crime And Deviance Essays

Many people over the years have tried to explain why there is crime in our society. Functionalists focus on the source of deviance in the nature of society rather than biological and psychological explanations. Every functionalist agrees that social control mechanisms e. g. the police are necessary to keep deviance in check and therefore protecting social order. A main contributor to the functionalist theory of crime is Durkheim. He believed that society is based on a value consensus and that all members of society share a common culture that is a set of shared values, norms, beliefs and goals.

Durkheim suggested that by society sharing the same culture created social solidarity, thereby binding individuals together and telling them what to strive for and how to conduct themselves. According to Durkheim crime has 4 functions in society, the first being that crime and deviance is “inevitable and normal”. He suggested that crime is inevitable, normal and necessary for life. He said crime is inevitable because not everyone in society is going to be equally committed to the shared values and morals as we are all exposed to different influences.

Durkheim gave the example of “even in a ‘society of saints’ with no crime at all, such high standards of behaviour would make even the smallest deviant act e. g. burping stand out”, this backs up his suggestion of deviance is inevitable and it will always be present in society. The second function that Durkheim outlined is that crime helps society to evolve. He said “yesterday’s deviance must become today’s normality”, Durkheim believed the crime helps society to review the way it does things so we can learn from the deviance and mistakes.

Thirdly Durkheim outlined that crime is functional. He proposed that crime could be functional and only becomes dysfunctional when its level is unusually high or low. He said very low rates lead to stagnation, while high rates lead to social disorganisation and chaos. Durkheim believed that change was healthy and in order for society to change yesterday’s deviance must become today’s norm. Durkheim also stated that shared values and morals must be in moderate for their influence not to be strong on the population or deviance would occur as people would object.

We can see this with the actions of Nelson Mandela, Mother Teresa and Martin Luther King who have all objected to the shared values and morals that have been too strong. The last function Durkheim believed crime gave to society is “crime can be positive”. He came up with two features, “boundary maintenance” and “adaptation and change”. Durkheim said crime produces a reaction for society, uniting its members in condemnation of the wrongdoers and reinforcing their commitment to the shared norms and values.

This is Durkheim’s way of describing punishment, which for him is to reaffirm society’s shared rules and reinforce social solidarity. Durkheim said this could be done though the courtroom which dramatises wrongdoing and publicly stigmatises the offender which reaffirms the values of the law-abiding majority and discourages others from rule breaking. The second feature is influenced by Durkheim’s belief that all change starts with an act of deviance. Durkheim believed there much be some wiggle room for individuals with new ideas, values and ways of living as way to challenge and change existing norms and values.

Crime And Deviance Essay

This paper explains the different sociological perspectives of deviance and in the essay I had compare each perspective to the movies that we watched in class dealing with crime.

The movies that were mentioned in this essay were-

"Menace II Society"

"News from a Personal War" documentary

"The Secret History of Street Gangs" documentary

"Good Fellas"

and "City of God".

There were also some references on the book "1984" by George Orwell.

There are many sociological perspectives on why criminal groups exist and the types of people that chooses to join such groups and why they do it. One of these perspectives, I believed that really explained this to me because of experiences is the Strain theory by Robert Merton. Basically, strain theory is concentrated among the lower classes that have the least legitimate opportunities for achievement. The lower classes are the most vulnerable to this pressure, and will maintain their unfulfilled economic ambition in spite of frustration or failure. There are other types of context within this theory such as innovation may result instead where people continue to seek success where they strive to obtain it by taking advantage of illegal goals available to them in place of getting real jobs or an education. Another one is rebellion, where people have completely rejected the idea that everybody in society can achieve success and so they go into a rebellious state. They neither trust the government to help them or societal means used to reach success. Instead, these people go into the violent overthrow of the system and community altogether and do things their own way. Retreatism is also applied in the strain theory; retreatism occurs when people basically become dropouts of society and rejects everything. They give up all goals and efforts to achieve success because they think it as an unrealistic, impossible and imaginary. These types of people are most likely to become drug addicts or an alcoholic, them not being able to obtain success by legitimate means represses them from society. Finally the last idea that is also applied in the strain theory is ritualism. During ritualism, people realize that they have no real opportunity to advance in society and accept whatever that they have. In ritualism, people focus on keeping what they can possibly gain or still have instead of trying to go for higher success. I say that these 4 ideas can be stages in the strain theory, even if some does not really apply to why criminal groups form, it sure does give you an idea of why they exist.

What makes a person become deviant? In the book,...

Loading: Checking Spelling


Read more

Cultural Criminology: A New Perspective to Understanding Crime and Deviance

2602 words - 10 pages Cultural criminology is a relatively new perspective and approach to understanding crime and deviance. Cultural criminology first began to develop in the 1990s and rapidly progressed in to a new field of criminology that is both influential and informative. The core concept of cultural criminology is built upon by using traditional approaches from different disciplines such as sociological studies, cultural studies, symbolic interactionism and...

How Crime and Deviance Can Be Seen As Functional for Society

2147 words - 9 pages Crime and deviance are acts that will elicit dissent from society. They take various forms and involve various concepts and theories. It will be the aim of this paper to explore those that are considered to be functional for society. It was Emile Durkheim who first clearly established the logic behind the functional approach to the study of crime and deviance[1] when he wrote The Rules of Sociological Method and The...

Labelling Theories' Contribution to the Sociological Understanding of Crime and Deviance

1575 words - 6 pages Labelling Theories' Contribution to the Sociological Understanding of Crime and Deviance Becker is the main sociologist studying labelling theory on deviance, he argues that 'social groups create deviance by making the rules whose infraction constitutes deviance.' Meaning acts only become deviant when observers perceive it and define it as deviant. An example of this would be the act of nudity, it is accepted in the ...

Write a sociological essay with regards to Crime and Deviance with a Functionalist perspective then critique it with a Marxist view.

1156 words - 5 pages The Marxist approach views society as a whole system that is in conflict. This conflict is between two opposing groups and steams from the contradictions in capitalism. These are the owners wanting to maximise profit whilst the workers want to increase wages. The infrastructure is industry and the most important part of society, therefore controlling the superstructure,...

Outline and assess the importance of victim surveys for sociological understanding of crime and deviance.

604 words - 2 pages There are many problems associated with the police recording of crime statistics, the main problem being that many crimes go unreported. As an alternative it was suggested that a cross section of the population should be asked about the crimes that have been commited against them. It was argued that more people would be likley to report crimes to an anonymous survey than to the police.There are several reasons why so many crimes go...

Sociology: Outline and assess left and right realist explanations of crime deviance.

711 words - 3 pages The right realist perspective on crime is mainly associated with the American sociologist W.J Wilson. This perspective became very influential on home office policy-making during the conservatives period in office.The right realist approach assumes that human beings are naturally selfish, individualistic and greedy. Therefore ther are 'naturally inclined' to further...

Money is the Root of All Evil- Monetary Issues Leads to Crime and Deviance

1003 words - 4 pages MONEY IS THE ROOT OF ALL EVIL Although money is good at times, it is basically the root of all evil. I think it would be better to say that the root of all evil is not money itself but people’s desire for money, which they could use to improve their own status, either greed to increase one’s status, or jealousy over losing in the status game to others. The Bible does not say that money is bad. What it does say is that it is "the love of money is...

The Ever-Changing Deviant Society

1514 words - 6 pages The normal daily routine for a father coming home at the end of a long day’s work is storming through the back door, slamming it shut, screaming obscenities at his wife and family, and secluding himself to his den for the rest of the evening. For this family, this happens daily and if were to not happen would cause concern and questioning. However, for the majority of Americans today this would be seen as hateful, wrong or deviant. Why is this...

Deviance in Society - The Sociology of Deviance

2215 words - 9 pages In everyday language, 'to deviate' means 'to stray from an accepted path' and most sociological definitions elaborate on this idea. What causes humans to act in certain ways is a disputed topic among researchers and many sociologists have tried to answer this question. This essay will critically analyse Durkheim's notion that even in a "society of saints" crime will still be found (Roach-Anleu 2006, p. 425) and further discuss the connection...

Social Control and Symbolic Interactionism in Literature

1351 words - 5 pages Social Control and Symbolic Interactionism in Literature The way in which social order is achieved has been the subject of many theories presented by respectable sociologists such as Emile Durkheim, Thomas Hobbes, George Herbert Mead, and Karl Marx. Among the most prominent of these theories are Hobbes’ “Social Control” theory and Meads’ “Symbolic Interactionism” theory. Through these two theories, it is possible to gain a better...

Deviance in sports.

1359 words - 5 pages Deviance In SportsDeviance In Sports As we the people of the world enter a new millennium many sociological problems can be viewed in everyday life. Problems, which often are confused and not well understood through the world's outlook. One such problem that this paper will focus on is "Deviance In Sports". This paper will discuss and elaborate on certain points and topics such as: 1. What is deviance? 2. How do acts of deviance...


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *